Statement from Sun Belt Conference Commissioner Karl Benson

December 9, 2013 · By · Filed Under Football, Sun Belt Conference 

SunBeltSecondaryLogo_2013

The 2013 regular season was the most competitive in the 13-year history of the Sun Belt – we had seven teams with records strong enough to qualify for bowls, the best ever non-conference win record, and a 6-1 record against our peer conferences – Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference and the Mountain West Conference.

When it was all over, UL-Lafayette and Arkansas State emerged as the league’s co-champions with the Cajuns accepting a bid to the R+L Carriers New Orleans Bowl and Arkansas State being selected by the Sun Belt’s second primary bowl, the GoDaddy Bowl.

The seven Sun Belt bowl eligible teams breaks the league’s previous record of five teams set last year and of all the other nine FBS conferences, the Sun Belt had the highest percentage of teams reach the bowl eligible mark – a tremendous achievement for the conference.

With seven bowl eligible teams from the Sun Belt along with a number of teams from other conferences in the at-large pool, we have known for several weeks that it was going to be very difficult, if not impossible, to place all of the bowl eligible teams from the Sun Belt into bowls that had open spots.

And during the past several weeks, I have been in discussions and negotiations with all the bowls that might be open. Specifically, the Sun Belt targeted the AdvoCare V100 Independence Bowl and Little Caesar’s Pizza Bowl and was in negotiations with both up until final decisions were made.

The Sun Belt Conference Presidents and Chancellors authorized me two weeks ago to use Sun Belt funds at my discretion to entice both bowls to take a Sun Belt team. As a result, the Sun Belt made very significant financial offers to both bowls that clearly exceeded anything the Sun Belt has done in previous years.

I am extremely disappointed, that while our efforts were very aggressive, we ended up not being able to place more than two of our bowl eligible teams – especially Western Kentucky University with an 8-4 record. While the current bowl system is beneficial, the system is flawed when in the last two years three teams with eight or more wins – WKU, Middle Tennessee and Louisiana Tech – are denied post season opportunities when 12 teams last season with 6-6 records and seven teams this season are allowed to play in bowl games. This comes in addition to 6-7 teams being allowed to play in bowl games in 2012 and 2011.

With all of this being said, it is important to reiterate several important facts.

First, the champion of the Sun Belt Conference does not automatically go to the R+L Carriers New Orleans Bowl.

Second, while the Sun Belt has suggested guidelines on how we would like teams to be selected for bowls, both the R+L Carriers New Orleans Bowl and GoDaddy Bowl ultimately have the freedom to choose the team that they feel is best for their game.

Lastly, once our two current bowl slots are filled there becomes a great deal of competition for open bowl slots. The discussions that we had with these open bowls involved significant financial contributions that put our teams in a position where they could be at or near the top of each bowl’s list of potential invitees.

We salute and congratulate the two bowl representatives from the Sun Belt. This is a time to celebrate the accomplishments of Sun Belt teams this season – and not focus on the negative. The Sun Belt continues to evolve, grow, and mature as one of ten FBS conferences. Beginning next season the Sun Belt will have a third primary bowl partner with the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Alabama and other guaranteed spots in the Bahamas Bowl and the Miami Beach Bowl, along with other potential new bowls that we are trying to develop. And of course, a major goal of ours will be to have a team in the newly formed College Football Playoff.

“Together we Rise” is the theme of the Sun Belt Conference because we stand firmly committed to our membership and our communities and we embrace the growth and evolution of the Sun Belt.

Comments

5 Responses to “Statement from Sun Belt Conference Commissioner Karl Benson”

  1. Huan on December 10th, 2013 10:55 am

    The Sun Belt needs to be more proactive and arrange bowl game ties in for more than just 2 teams. If they are willing to commit financially this year, they should do so this year for next season as well so they wouldn’t have to scramble at next’s season end.

  2. Brian on December 11th, 2013 7:14 am

    It takes time. In 2014 they will be tied to the new Camellia Bowl in Montgomery. They will also have ties with two other new bowl games, Miami Beach and Jamaica Bowls, though they will be part of a rolling tie-in with those.

  3. Huan on December 11th, 2013 9:47 am

    the goal should be 4 bowls tie in minimum, 6 preferably (half the conference).
    there also should be tie in with the MAC, CUSA, MWC, AAC, and 2 for the P5 match ups.

  4. Brian on December 11th, 2013 12:12 pm

    Yes they do. I think we are pretty equal to the other “Non-AQ” conferences, but we definitely seem to be the bottom of the pecking order currently. We definitely need to be more aggressive towards bowl ties and we need to get a 12th football school for the conference for a conference championship game and exposure. I think that was truly why WKU was poached away by CUSA, so we wouldn’t have 12 and a championship game.

  5. Huan on December 11th, 2013 7:58 pm

    The next round of expansion will see the AAC lose a team. They will take from CUSA. CUSA should still have at least 12 without having to take from the Sun Belt. But the sun belt does need a 12th team to get that conference championship game. With the limited numbers of games CC game weekend, the sun belt game will be broadcasted, which will be good for the conference. Play it on Thursday night if need be.

    Look at Liberty and or JMU

Leave a Reply




%d bloggers like this: